Glorious Language Martyr Day

Nidhu Bhusan Das : Bangladesh deserves to be proud of being the embodiment of a linguistic nationalism which replaced the communal nationalism of Pakistan. The emergence of the country forty years ago marked the end of the relevance of the Two-nation theory in East Pakistan. The theory was enunciated by the British to divide the Indians on communal line in their imperialistic interest. The seed of Bangali nationalism germinated precisely on 21 February 1952 when blood was shed to suppress the Language Movement. Since then 21 February is celebrated as Language Martyr Day, fondly called Amor Ekushe. In East Pakistan it was celebrated every year as the day of resolve to be free from exploitation and injustice in the name of religion. Even to-day it is the day of resolve to protect secularism and the values of the liberation war the nation fought in 1971. The famous song – Can I forget the Ekushe February dyed red in the blood of my brethren (AAmi ki bhulite paari aamar bhaiyer rakte rangano Ekushe February) sung on the day tells of the sacred resolve. In fact, February is the month of pride and pledge for the people of Bangladesh. It has become the pride of all peoples across the globe since UNESCO declared the Language Martyr Day, the 21st February as the International Mother Tongue Day. For Bangladesh, this month is of great pride for it symbolizes their sacrifice for the prestige of their mother tongue Bengali. They have the rich heritage of shedding blood for awarding the mother tongue it's due place of honor as a state language. When soon after the founding of Pakistan it was announced that Urdu 'shall' be the state language of that country, the people of East Pakistan protested vehemently. As the Pakistan Government did not heed to the protest the language movement continued to gain in momentum and culminated in the martyrdom of students in Dhaka. The Language Movement and the Martyrdom are a milestone in the history of the growth and evolution of Bangali Nationalism which ultimately led to the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 through a nine-month war of liberation in which India played a historical role. The language movement, in course of time, graduated into a struggle for a distinct national identity of the Bangalis of East Pakistan. They, in the long run, seceded from Pakistan for freedom from economic exploitation, political independence from colonial clutches and cultural emancipation. They had to pay a heavy price as thirty lakh people were killed by the Pakistani occupation army and their collaborators during the nine months of liberation war and many women were raped, physical infrastructure was destroyed. The collaborators are now facing trial before a War Crime Tribunal. Bangladesh had a traumatic period within about four years of her birth when conspirators against secularism and Bangali Nationalism killed the founding father of the nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman along with his family members on 15 August 1975. After the killing of Bangabandhu and toppling of his government the usurpers changed the basic structure of the Constitution of the country deleting secularism. Besides, the usurpers also indemnified the killers of the father of the nation and rewarded them. Back in power in 1996, the Awami League under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina, the surviving elder daughter of Sheikh Mujib instituted cases against the Bangabandhu killers. They were charge sheeted. The trial could not be completed before they were out of power. The next regime of BNP-Jamat alliance put the trial of the cases to the back burner. The present alliance government of Sheikh Hasina accelerated the trial and five killers were hanged unto death after the apex court of the country confirmed the death sentence awarded to them by the trial court. Five of the killers are abroad, and the government seeks their extradition. This is the month for taking pledge for the people of the country. They are yet to achieve economic freedom through national prosperity. The national affluence is yet elusive because of the regressive policies pursued by different regimes in the name of Islam. The present government of Sheikh Hasina has sworn to modernize the polity with programs like 'Digital Bangladesh' and bringing back secularism in the Constitution and in real life of the nation. Dhaka has a number of achievements to boast of. Meanwhile, the Unesco declared the Language Martyr Day ( 21 February ) as the International Mother Tongue Day .The SAARC is a reality . The member nations can utilize the forum for mutual gain and individual as well as regional prosperity as they are doing in Europe with their European Union. Not suspicion, but understanding and goodwill can help bring peace and prosperity. Understanding can grow only in a democratic and secular climate. Reverting to secularism Bangladesh is back to the root and can win the trust of the democratic world to it’s advantage insofar as it’s development efforts are concerned. It is heartening that Bangladesh has reinvented itself and can now work for it’s progress and economic growth, instead of being busy with fundamentalist rhetorics and raising war cry against India. Only the spirit of Ekushe February and unity of the secular-democratic forces can prevent attempts at jeopardizing the democratic process. Bangladesh is a nation with prospects because of its rich alluvial soil, manpower and strategic position in South Asia. A good neighborly relation with India can help a lot in making Bangladesh a prosperous nation. The nation should be proud of her secularism at birth and pursue the policy instead of the regressive fundamentalism to be true to the spirit of nationalism which led to the emergence of the country following a protracted struggle.

Glorious Ekushe

Nidhu Bhusan Das : Sixty years from now, on 21 February 1952 they laid down their lives demanding the prestige due to their mother tongue Bangla. They were Rafiq , Jabbar , Barkat , Salam et al. The Pakistan Police pumped bullets into them. Why? They rented the air of Dhaka with the slogan ‘We demand state language status for Bangla.’ Bangalis were the largest speech community in Pakistan. Yet Pakistan Government was arrogant enough to award the status to Urdu, the language of only twelve per cent of Pakistanis. Hence was the protest of the Bangalis of East Pakistan, known earlier as East Bengal. Bangladesh as usual began the month-long celebrations of the martyrdom on 1 February. The emotion and respect the Bangladeshis demonstrate thoughtout the month of February in remembrance of the martyrdom is, perhaps, unparalleled. The Day subsequently inspired in East Pakistan movements for justice and emancipation from exploitation and for cultural freedom. The people of East Pakistan struggled relentlessly for nineteen years more for freedom, and emerged victorious on 16 December 1971 when they breathed the air of free Bangladesh which they achieved after a nine-month war against the occupation army of Pakistan. On that day, under General Niazi 93 thousand strong Pakistan Army surrendered to the joint command of Indian Army and the Freedom Fighters of Bangladesh in Dhaka. However, Bangladesh could not shake off the heritage of Pakistan. On 15 August 1975, some disgruntled elements in the Army killed the founding father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman along with his family members, and usurped power installing the murdered leader’s long time colleague Khandakar Mustaq Ahmed as President of the People’s Republic. De facto army rule continued as coups and counter coups followed in the country. The fundamental principles of the constitution of 1972 were jettisoned to give it an Islamic character. The collaborators of Pakistan Army who committed genocide, rape, arson and plunder during the nine- month occupation got entrenched in power politics and spread the message of fundamentalism of the hue of Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Bangladesh today is plagued, inter alia, with the problem of the presence of Islamic extremist organizations like JMB. This, obviously, goes against the spirit of cultural nationalism promoted through the sacrifice of 21 February and subsequent growth of Bangali Nationalism which culminated into the Liberation War and creation of Bangladesh. Religious fundamentalism is an anachronism today when Human Rights find top priority in a civilized society. Bangladesh may, in course of time, atone for the regressive steps of military-fundamentalist dispensation which have pulled back the country, despite her having potentialities for development. She has rich alluvial soil for agriculture, strength of manpower and a strategic geo-political position in South Asia.

The Myth and Aura Will Pass Away

Nidhu Bhusan Das The Mamata myth appears to be waning rapidly after Ms Banerjee has become the Chief Minister of West Bengal. The Chief Minister tends more to play to the gallery than to be serious about steering the state clear of the mess she inherited from the left rule of about 35 years. She deserves credit for the ouster of the Left Front from power. It was she who pulled down the left edifice which once was thought to be impregnable. Her sustained movement against what was seen as left misrule earned her the credibility which ultimately catapulted her to power in the state. Once in power, she is in a hurry to project herself as the Santa Claus to the people, and heaps promise upon promise to keep the people in good humour.Even she squanders money in the form of donations to the clubs of the state and her government organizes gala festivals while roads and highways remain degraded. Siliguri has begun to be illuminated on the occasion of the North Bengal Festival which she will inaugurate at Kanchenjunga Krirangan (stadium) on 10 February next when many roads of the municipal corporation are in terrible condition. The corporation is under their coalition rule. This is like building Tajmahal ignoring the fact that many impoverished subjects were unfed. Mamata is seen to be honest personally. But many of her party men during their eight months in power could have proven that given the scope they could be corrupt and corruptible. They have already had the arrogance which goes with power for those who enjoy power and tend to abuse it. Quite a number of them have become paper tigers and seek to use the media for projecting themselves. This, perhaps, cannot augur well for the party and its supremo. Mamata and her party call their coalition partner Congress the B team of CPI(M) but in case of North Bengal University it is found that they are so far apparently on the same wavelength with CPI(M) in respect of alleged corruptions galore. During their eight months in power, permission could not be granted for filing charge sheet against a registrar against whom the university lodged an FIR during the left rule alleging corruptions involving crores of rupees. This irony of situation may not be without reason, politically significant. If the charge sheet is not filed in time, the case against the person will become infructuous. People, in the know of the affairs of the university, may read the meaning in it in their own way. If Mamata allows scope for such reading and go on with her populism, the myth about and the aura around her will pass away. She may continue in power but will lose authority and goodwill she earned after a long and ceaseless struggle for the cause of the people.

Wise Dudu Takes Over

Wise Dudu Takes Over Nidhu Bhusan Das Rupam has a new boss.He is young,reticent,and wears the air of intellectuality.A stubble moustache hides expression that may linger on his upper lip.The new boss Dudu Chakladar has inherited the chair and the property of his father who has died recently at a little known kolkata nursing home without any fanfare.The son has been quick to take over.Since then he has been quite prompt to establish his power and control on the mini media empire his father has built and left behind.Rupam has found a new importance in the dispensation of the new boss.Dudu is 35,father of one son,who is,unlike,Dudu lucky to have no sibling. Dudu need not think,like his father, of partitioning the property as he has the sole heir. Dudu is confident he knows everything of the trade. Saurav Chakladar had a team of confidantes whom Dudu would not like to deal with. He,quite reasonably and expectedly, has chosen his own team of young people who respect and follow him faithfully.This has created a withdrawal mood among those who feel let down after the demise of the founder of the empire.They have their own interpretation of the attitude of Dudu.They say Dudu suffers from inferiority complex which his young followers would not take.Rupam feels Dudu is wise enough to discard the old haggards and pick up his dynamic young team.In fact, there is nothing wrong in it.Every leader should have the privilege to choose his own team,be it in business, sports, politics and in other fields.Dudu in his wisdom would have it that the senior employees quit, being embarrassed. This, of course, is a pragmatic idea. Rupam , handpicked by the senior Chakladar for odd jobs , is a resourceful boy.He can sniff and follow events , decide which is the favourable current to float on. So,he quickfixed himself and remained constantly attached to Dudu when the father Chakladar was in the nursing home.Dudu has the impression Rupam was privy to the plans and programmes of his father,and,therefore, has made him his lieutenant. He thinks he would be able to keep his sister at bay from the media empire equipped with information shared from Rupam. In fact, he could. Elated,Rupam uses all his means to help upgrade those who ,he thinks, will remain loyal to him,whatever be the consequences for the empire.Rupam knows Dudu remains engrossed in stock trading, and is dependent on him for information about the day to day activities in the media houses. The executives of the houses also are,by now,aware of the fact and,thus, Rupam also commands their awe.What Rupam assesses and says becomes the decision of Dudu. Rupam felt Kalinath Roy,news-in-charge of The People should be replaced by Shyam Singh and Dudu in no time abliged him.Kalinath not being far away from retirement could not come in conflict with Dudu,who,he understands, is impertinent and see by the ear..With this change Dudu and Rupam have been able to strike terror on the old haggards and the executives to the delight of Rupam loyalists.The turn for Rupam to be rewarded handsomely has come. His loyalists are known to be close to the ruling party always,and party leaders ,in many cases, tend to be paper tigers.This fact has created opportunities for Rupam,his followers and Dudu.After the change of guards in the state,Dudu feels his extra-importance as a couple of ministers of the new government have established firm relationship with him.The new government pledged it would cleanse the academic institutions of corruptions and party-ism. But it has not happened,rather people alleged to be in corrupt practices are apparently sought to be relieved. Dudu asked Kalinath to contribute a post edit every week,and he issued a circular to the effect. Kalinath’s post edit on the the bungling of the couple of ministers at the Royal University irks Dudu who has been promised a large tract of land in Dreamland for his pet project of a tourist resort. Dudu is right,Rupam is wise,his loyalists are happy.Newspaper is for business,and editors like Dudu make business in different ways.Business ethics may not always go with media ethics.writers in newspapers with such editors do not have the freedom to write what he knows to be true.They have to know what the editor in his business interest knows to be true,or they are to be thrown overboard.

Our Paramita

Our Paramita Nidhu Bhusan Das If you ask me what her Achilles’ heel is, I will readily say ‘She’ll break but not bend.’ Yes, she is determined, forward looking, and has the emotion and dream to do something for the people she leads. Our Paramita is now on the pinnacle. She has scaled the height after a long struggle which was made difficult by dictatorship-of-the-proletariat-ideology, behind the scene manipulation of her parent organization and fatal attack on her person. Her birth in a little known family came in the way of her going ahead down a path strewn with roses – rather it was thorns all the way. In the male dominated state- politics she carved her niche facing odds. She earned the love and affection of her people demonstrating her uncompromising stance in respect their interest. Even she recorded a hunger strike of 26 days to press for the cause of the affected peasants of her state. Yet one cannot be sure how far she will succeed because the serpents are around spiting venom. People may misunderstand her vis-à-vis the concerted campaigns of her detractors within and outside her coalition. Besides, a horde of sycophants are all around to mislead her. Perhaps, she needs a fool, as we find in a Shakespearean tragedy like ‘King Lear’. Her Dreamland was in the immediate past the fiefdom of the red rulers who earned the reputation of turning it into a graveyard – literally and metaphorically. After a resounding victory in the polls, she has formed a government to the relief of the people. Unwilling to lick the dust for long, the red are up and doing to resurrect with the help of former allies who are in the coalition government of Paramita as a junior partner. She understands it but is, most likely, unaware of the foul play of a section of her colleagues in the government and the party. One of her senior colleagues in the cabinet has been registered as a PhD student under a red activist in Proscenium University with the understanding that another red activist allegedly involved in corruptions of huge proportions will be given the tactical space to go scot-free. Another cabinet colleague helped him in striking the deal. Many of her party colleagues at the grass root level are in the same role as the red were during their long rule. In fact, many from the red party were welcomed into the party by her junior colleagues to utilize their experienced hands for perpetuation of corruptions to their personal benefits, and, thus, to the detriment of the party and government. The duo have brought Dudu Chakladar, the editor- by- inheritance of the daily newspaper ‘ The Gatekeeper’ within their fold offering him a large tract of land for his pet project of a tourist resort. If she fails to understand this and remains unaware of the diabolic activities within her house, innocence will be the victim, and a dream will end in nullity. Rituja, one of her party men says, ‘Didi (sister) is overworked … the state is in shambles, no money, no infrastructure, a politicized bureaucracy … it’s difficult.’ People may give her more time to bring the state back to track. ‘But how long?’ wondered Motilal, a resident of Nandigram which turned out to be the Waterloo of the red. This is a moot question, but could be a decider if her party colleagues continue to replicate the anti-people activities in the rural belt and the government fails to begin delivering the goods. ‘Paramita’, tells her wise octogenarian mother, ‘don’t go by what the sycophants say, give importance to the critics who point out mistakes and faults, throw suggestions. Remember, to err is human. Don’t be in the illusion that you cannot make mistakes.’ We don’t know if she will follow the advice of the mother.

Equity a Far Cry, in West Bengal Intolerance Rules

Nidhu Bhusan Das

Democracy degenerates when party politics overpowers governance.In West Bengal politics, dominated for a long time by the leftists,terms like fascism and fascists became clichés.The predecessor of Ms Mamata Banerjee betrayed his scarce respect for democracy when he said ‘we are 235 and they are 30’.If this presumption of Mr. Buddhadev Bhattacharyya smacked of fascist tendency,the use of the phrase ‘barking dogs’ by the incumbent Chief Minister in oblique reference to her opponents suggests intolerance which is anathema to democracy.The present state of academic institutions and student politics demonstrates intolerance which may lead to anarchy, if allowed to persist unabated in the absence of the impartial role of the police which the Chief Minister promised on the assumption of power after a landslide victory in the assembly polls,and which is conspicuous in its absence till date.The assailants of the teacher-in-charge of Raigonj University College were booked under bailable sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) while the assailants of the Principal of Majdia College were booked under non-bailable sections. The Home(Police) Department is held by the Chief Minister.Such discriminatory approach frustrates the Chief Minister’s espousal of a equity-based dispensation.
The people of the state voted out the Left Front believing Mamata would be able to live upto their expectation of an egalitarian society where equity and rule of law would prevail.The way police have dealt with the incidents in different colleges so far has belied the expectation. The controversy over ‘Indira Bhawan’ at Salt Lake,Kalkata between ruling coalition partners Trinamool Congress and Congress is unwarranted as much as the hurling of invectives between them has crossed all limits of decency and responsible behaviour. Trinamool Congress as the major partner of the coalition in the state has the primary responsibility to keep the flock together for the sake of good governance which reticent Chief Minister Mr. Nitish Kumar could have been able to provide in Bihar which was once thought to be a difficult state to govern.
The Chief Minister harps on the denial of special package by the centre for the revival of the economic health of the state. True,the package remains elusive. But what about the central schemes like NREG for which funds have been transferred ? The state government has miserably failed in different districts to guarantee to the rural poor employment for 100 days this financial year.The government may say it has not got a full year to implement the scheme but that would not justify the failure because they have passed seven months and a half which period is marked by inaction in respect of such projects. Inefficiency and lack of vision on the part of the concerned minister could be the cause of such failure.If these progammes could have been implemented in earnestness and with vision, the rural Bengal could have seen a semblance of development, if not a full scale resurgence.

.The government,no doubt, has been successful in taming the violent Jungle Mahal and Darjeeling hills,which are not a mean achievement. The peace is fragile and may, any time, be disturbed and lost if development activities can not be started within a reasonable time. However, if the government remains busy with trading blames, altercating and the interest of the ruling party is seen to be synonymous with public interest,good governance will be beyond the horizon.West Bengal will,eventually, slide into a state of hopelessness.

Pro-Active Marjit Shares Govt. Strategy With Anti-VC Agitationists

Nidhu Bhusan Das



The Empoyees’ Association agitating against the Vice- Chancellor of North Bengal
University (NBU) appears to have a privileged relationship with the Chairman of West Bengal State Council of Higher Education Prof. Sugata Marjit.They evidently share ideas and strategy against the VC who opened the Pandora’s Box of alleged corruptions in the university,lodged FIR against Registrar Dilip Sarkar and suspended him for reported financial irregularities involving crores of rupees.

The pro-active Chairman Prof. Marjit is in private correspondence with the General Secretary of the association sharing the intentions and roadmap of the government regarding the installation of the next vice- chancellor of the university.He appears to be apologetic to the General Secretary Debi Prasad Boot in his e-mail of 18 December last in quick reply to Mr. Boot’s .
Mr. Boot writes to Prof Marjit on 17 December : ‘ The CPM nominated VC and his coterie spreading the extension of his tenure after 31st December 2011.Kindly stop this venture immediately to save our university.’
While Mr. Boot simply sought his intervention to prevent the extension of the tenure of the VC,Prof. Marjit is elaborate enough and shares other pieces of information .He informs Mr Boot that the VC has sent him the copy of the office order regarding the salary/pension affair and the recovery of the extra payment.
He also shares the information that the Higher Education office ‘has advised the VC regarding the Acting Registrar appointment problem,and it is being looked into by the government.’
Prof. Marjit candidly assures Mr. Boot he is ‘not in the business of making false promises’ leaving scope to construe that he might have made genuine promises to Mr. Boot.
The Chairman says, ‘all of us here prefer an immediate change ( of VC)’ and urges Mr.
Boot to realize their constraints and also to appreciate the fact that in spite of repeated
lobbying from different quarters inside and outside the government for no change at
least for a year,they are initiating a process of change definitely by early next year,by the
beginning of April. ‘The extension for 3 months (of VC’s tenure),if that’s the case,is in
the view of the Hon’ble Chancellor,NOT MINE,’says Prof.Marjit apologetically who
concuded the letter saying ‘I have done all I could.’ The tone, tenor and content of the
e-mail suggests Prof.Marjit and Mr.Boot are on the same wavelength vis-à-vis the
incumbent VC.The Alimuddin Street and their comrades in Kolkata University were
hand- in- glove against late Prof Santosh Bhattacharyya during his tenure as VC, recall
independent people in the NBU campus.