Two Novels: A Discourse on the Pains of Partition

          Two Novels: A Discourse
          on the Pains of Partition
                                        Nidhu Bhusan Das


      ‘Dui Nagar’ and ‘Keertinasha’ are a discourse on the pains and trauma of the partition of Bengal in 1947.The exodus of Hindus from East Bengal, rechristened East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, and that of Muslims from West Bengal, now Bangla is the theme of both the novels by Tanvir Mokammel, a renowned film maker and poet of Bangladesh who has recently entered into the realm of novel writing. We know Tanvir has the knack and a profound sense of duty to document the events and movements in the chequered history of Bengal. He is set to return from page to celluloid with his upcoming docu-film ‘Seemantarekha’ with the same theme.

      ‘Keertinasha’ reflects Tanvir’s egalitarian approach to the subject while it is evidently elitist in ‘Dui Nagar’.’Keertinasha’ is the tale of cementing/reinforcing  friendship between two neighbouring Hindu and Muslim families against the imminent materialization of the hitherto amorphous Pakistan, till today called an Acronym by intellectuals like Pakistan born Canadian Tareq Fatah.

      ‘Dui Nagar’ begins with a qoute from ‘A TALE OF TWO CITIES’, a fictionalized account of the Frech Revolution based,inter alia, on Dickens’ reading of Carlyle’s ‘French Revolution’.The lengthy first sentence of the novel, which the present novelist partially excerpts (“It was the best of times,it was the worst of times…”), set the tone of the victorian novel.Dickens drew his inspiration not only from Carlyle’s work but also drew on Wilkie Collins’ ‘The Frozen Deep’ the theme of which is love- two eligible persons being in love  simultaneously,with a lovely girl.Dickens’ novel,turns out to be a love story in the background of the French Revolution,and the novelist consciously foregrounded the story of love.No such foregrounding of love is intended and found in ‘Dui Nagar’.

        In the English novel,the yarn is spun with Dr. Manette being the link between the history and the love story.If  Lucie Manette is innocence-incarnate,the research scholar Jayati from Kolkata is experience-incarnate in ‘Dui Nagar’.Two  suitors seek her hand,she reciprocates the love of Charles Darnay who has declassed himself detesting the brutality of his father and uncle  and their estate.She couldn’t reciprocate sydney Carton’s love ,but she had profound compassion and love for him,and he  ultimately,for the sake of Lucie, saved the life of Darnay,choosing to be beheaded under the Guillotine.

      Unlike ‘A TALE OF TWO CITIES’ , ‘Dui Nagar’ is a docu-novel.The former is not a story of exodus of refugees across the international border of two neighbouring countries  as the latter is.In the ‘Tale’ we find love transcends cruelty.Jayati is in Dhaka  in connection with her research on ‘Partition and Trauma of Women’. Which women? Those house wives who had to leave  their dear hearth and home for an uncertain future which awaited the families of refugees?Perhaps,it is not within the capacity of Jayati to delve into the essence of the trauma,she being esconced in a well-to-do family and having premarrital sexual experience twice with two boy friends,the thirst remaining undiminished. Only the love making with Professor Raihan could satisfy her and she asks her man of choice on the eve of departure:” Coming to Kolkata,sure?” Raihan replies, suggestively:”Go I must.”Jayati travelled but didn’t go for survey or field work in Bangladesh.Maybe, her thesis will be enriched with open source data ,and  discussions in the drawing rooms and over tea and dinner in the elite circuit.A  freedom fighter and married,Professor Raihan is in the Shahbag Movement which is yet to spread across the country effectively enough to counter the fundamentalists,its avowed goal.It apprears to be elite inspired and remains elite-centric.The freedom fighter has evolved into a different man,being coaxed by Jayati. He could have been a Shohrab ( ‘Keertinasha’) had the author not abandoned the railroad from Kolkata to Bongaon for the road journey between Dhaka and Barishal via Faridpur to enhance the desire of his heroine. Raihan has been deprived of his finer feeling and emotion reflected in his quest for a boyhood friend Aboni who is settled in Bongaon across the border.Jayati accompanies him in his successful quest,but friendship is not overcast by lust.Afterall,character is characterization,poor Raihan!

       Apart from this, the research of the author himself into the phenomenon of post-partition exodus which has gone into the making of his debut novel is praiseworthy. His thought is felt and his erudition lends objectivity to his story, rather than being a burden.The novelist could have,perhaps, reasonably done away with the idea of  inserting a puerile  research scholar in the story, or bring one who is not sensual but sensitive to be  a character really contributing to the story.Has the author not lost the train and derailed Raihan?

      Tanvir has done the job quite well,and with courage, in his second novel ‘Keertinasha’.

     ‘Keertinasha’ presents the effort of two families-one Hindu, one Muslim – to continue as neighbours in amity. The two families lived at a village of Bikrampur which bore the brunt of the destructive potential of the mighty Padma. If the Padma devoured the fertile soil and edifices of Bikrampur, partition of Bengal deprived it of its rich cultural heritage and intellectual pride and proclivity. One may read into the text the Saudade of the poet-novelist - had there been no partition!

       Two patriarchs of the neighbouring families- the Hindu school teacher and the Muslim peasant- sheltered under the village banyan from rain on their way back home one night decided to ceremonially befriend their sons of the same age. The teacher mooted the proposal and the peasant agreed to it. The ceremony was held accordingly, and Sohrab and Suhas were knotted in friendship.Though this was not a novelty (the novelist said such ceremony was in vogue),the backdrop agaist which it was held was significant,a desperate attempt to remain in amity given the communal overtone of the Two Nations Theory which gradually found acceptance in Bengal. The two friends remained together till the ultimate migration of the family of the Hindu friend Suhas to India.

        The novel doesn’t have any heroine like in ‘Dui Nagar’.Sohrab,the protagonist, in his melancholy  on the bank of the Padma to bid adieu to the family,resolves to save Bikrampur from the future havoc to be wreaked by the aggressive river.Let’s echo the  loud thought of Sohrab articulated by the novelist:” Suhas is gone.He(Sohrab) has to fight alone against the  aggression,must protect and preserve the glorious heritage of Bikrampur of his forefathers.Will he be able to do it? Sohrab feels a bit lonely standing on the bank of Keertinasha Padma in the late evening of the month of Shravon.Yes,it would have been better if Suhas stayed back.”The absence of a heroine doesn’t create any impression that the tale lacks love.The love for Bikrampur, the pining for the friend and the sense of his heritage together help the protagonist  to be resolute.For the novelist ,the aggressive Padma symbolizes destructive politics which the Divide and Rule Ploicy of the British engendered driving a wedge between the two communities that lived in amity for centuries.

Dui Nagar

Keertinasha

Author: Tanvir Mokammel

Publisher

Creative Dhaka Publications

12,Outer Circular Road

Razarbagh,Dhaka-1217

creativedhakaltd@gmail.com


www.creativedhakalimited.com

Chicken Neck and the talk of a Union Territory in the North

  Chicken Neck and the talk of a Union Territory in the North Nidhu Bhusan Das Partition of Bengal and creation of a Union territory in ...